07/21/2023 / By Ethan Huff
Ukraine’s counteroffensive against Russia is failing, and with this comes the loss of one third of all the armored fighting vehicles that the United States has sent to Kyiv since the start of the year.
At least 34 Bradley Fighting Vehicles (BFV) have already been taken out by Russia, we are told, despite these armored vehicles having been hailed as a “game-changer” by the ruling class elites who told us all that Volodymyr Zelensky needed them to win the war.
Reports indicate that the Bradley vehicles “have now been visually confirmed as having been abandoned, damaged or destroy,” citing “open source” data from the military research firm Oryx.
The U.S. sent as many as 109 BFVs to Ukraine since the start of the war. They were first deployed on the battlefield in April.
Fake president Joe Biden told America back in January that the Bradley tanks would be sent to Kyiv, while the Pentagon touted them as “tank-killers,” claiming they would provide “a level of firepower and armor that will bring advantages on the battlefield.”
Numerous corporate-controlled media outlets – from Newsweek and Business Insider to The Washington Post – also parroted the claim that the Bradley tanks were going to be a “game-changer,” which is clearly not the case.
(Related: Even deep state neocons now admit that the Ukrainian landscape is littered with Pentagon-run “biological research facilities.”
All along, Russia has been warning the West that procuring Ukraine with BFVs and other Western-supplied weapon would “only prolong the suffering of the Ukrainian people,” which it has.
During just the first two weeks of its attempted counteroffensive, Kyiv lost 20 percent of the equipment it was given. This, according to The New York Times, is the reason why Zelensky decided to hit the pause button so soon.
Russia was quick to destroy a large number of Kyiv’s U.S.-supplied fighting vehicles early on, forcing Ukrainian forces to abandon their armored vehicles and advance much more slowly on foot.
“You can no longer do anything with just a tank with some armor because the minefield is too deep, and sooner or later, it will stop, and then it will be destroyed by concentrated fire,” stated Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s top general.
By all appearances, Ukraine has already lost the war, despite the Western media and political structure’s best efforts to claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin is crazy or dying from cancer or whatever the fake news story of the week might be.
If Ukraine is losing, then so are the American taxpayers who have been forced to fund Zelensky’s military. How many more weapons need to be spent and how much more cash needs to be sent before the West gives up on trying to stop Putin from cleansing Ukraine of the deep state infrastructure that exists there?
Between the bioweapons factories, money laundering networks, and child trafficking syndicates that have proliferated there, Ukraine is a hotbed of crime that Russia wants removed from its borders – and that all free people everywhere want removed from the world.
“It’s time to arrest Biden for war crimes,” one commenter suggested as part of the solution. “He’s given orders to deliver cluster munitions to Nazis.”
“Wait, didn’t Biden just say that Russia lost the war in Ukraine?” asked another about the constant lies coming from the U.S. regime. “Is he lying to the world or does he get his info from a U.S.-made video game?”
Will the conflict in Ukraine swell into World War III? Learn more at WWIII.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
armored vehicles, BFV, Biden, Bradley Fighting Vehicle, Joe Biden, Kyiv, military tech, military technology, Pentagon, Russia, tanks, Ukraine, weapons technology, WWIII, Zelensky
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECHNOLOGY.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTechnology.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTechnology.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.