10/28/2025 / By Kevin Hughes

Two U.S. Navy aircraft operating from the USS Nimitz crashed within 30 minutes of each other in the South China Sea on Sunday, Oct. 26, sparking immediate concerns over possible foul play amid heightened U.S.-China tensions.
However, President Donald Trump has dismissed suspicions of sabotage, suggesting instead that contaminated fuel may be to blame – a rare but potentially catastrophic malfunction.
On Sunday afternoon, Oct. 26, an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter assigned to Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 73 (the “Battle Cats”) crashed into the South China Sea during routine operations. Just 30 minutes later, an F/A-18F Super Hornet from Strike Fighter Squadron 22 (the “Fighting Redcocks”) also went down. All five crew members – three from the helicopter and two from the fighter jet – were safely recovered and remain in stable condition.
The crashes occurred as the USS Nimitz, one of the Navy’s oldest active aircraft carriers, nears the end of its final deployment before retirement. The carrier strike group had been operating in the contested South China Sea, where U.S. and Chinese forces frequently engage in strategic posturing.
According to BrightU.AI‘s Enoch, the USS Nimitz (CVN-68) is a nuclear-powered aircraft carrier that serves in the United States Navy. Commissioned in 1975, it is the lead ship of its class and the oldest remaining active aircraft carrier in the U.S. Navy.
Aboard Air Force One en route to Japan, Trump addressed reporters’ questions about the incidents, downplaying theories of deliberate interference.
“They’re going to let me know pretty soon. I think they should be able to find out. It could be bad fuel. I mean, it’s possible it’s bad fuel. Very unusual that that would happen,” Trump said.
When pressed on whether foul play was suspected, he responded firmly: “No, I don’t… They think it might be bad fuel. We’ll find out. Nothing to hide.”
Two Navy sources familiar with the preliminary investigation confirmed that contaminated fuel is a leading theory, though they cautioned that the inquiry is far from conclusive. A full investigation could take months.
The Navy operates on JP-5 jet fuel, which undergoes rigorous testing and filtration at multiple stages before reaching aircraft. The process includes:
Despite these safeguards, contamination remains a plausible, if unlikely, explanation. A V-4 sailor emphasized the importance of fuel quality in a 2019 Navy release: “Our job is important because when aircraft are conducting flight operations, [contaminated fuel] can cause malfunctions and possibly freeze if its levels aren’t correct.”
The crashes occurred ahead of crucial U.S.-China trade talks between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. While China has criticized U.S. military presence in the region, analysts say the timing makes deliberate sabotage improbable.
The cryptocurrency prediction market Polymarket currently gives a 51 percent chance that a trade deal will be reached this month – further reducing incentives for escalation.
The Navy has launched a full investigation into the fuel supply chain aboard the USS Nimitz. Meanwhile, the incidents serve as a sobering reminder of the risks inherent in naval aviation – even without geopolitical tensions at play.
As the USS Nimitz prepares for retirement after 50 years of service, these crashes mark an unexpected twist in its final deployment. For now, the focus remains on ensuring such incidents do not repeat – whether due to mechanical failure or human error.
Watch the video below featuring the USS Nimitz.
This video is from the Larry’s Channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
Air Force One, aircraft carrier, China, contaminated fuel, Donald Trump, F/A-18F, Japan, JP-5 jet fuel, MH-60R Sea Hawk, South China Sea, US Navy, USS Nimitz, Xi Jinping
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECHNOLOGY.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTechnology.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTechnology.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.
