06/29/2025 / By Laura Harris
Iran has confirmed that several of its nuclear facilities suffered severe damage following U.S. military strikes, marking a significant escalation in the ongoing conflict between Washington and Tehran.
On June 22, the U.S. launched Operation Midnight Hammer, deploying B-2 stealth bombers to drop 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on three of Iran’s key nuclear sites – Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan. The strikes were intended to cripple the nuclear program of Iran following the collapse of diplomatic negotiations between the two countries. (Related: DHS warns of heightened cyber threats from Iran after U.S. strikes on nuclear facilities.)
In line with this, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei acknowledged the extent of the destruction for the first time on Wednesday, June 25.
“Yes, our nuclear installations have been badly damaged. That’s for sure because [they have] come under repeated attacks,” he said.
Despite the admission, Baghaei declined to provide specific details about the condition of the nuclear sites, the extent of the damage or the current status of Iran’s nuclear program. “I have nothing to add on this issue because it’s a matter of technical issue,” he said, noting that the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI) and related agencies were handling the matter.
Baghaei also used the opportunity to condemn recent Israeli actions in the region. He accused Israel of committing war crimes against Iranian civilians. “Our people were massacred by Israel’s aggression. That’s war crimes, crimes against humanity and they [Israel] have to be held accountable.”
That same day, President Donald Trump declared a sweeping victory in the Iran-Israel conflict, crediting his decision to join Israeli military strikes for bringing the war to a close.
“We destroyed the nuclear. We’ll meet with them. Maybe we’ll sign something, maybe we won’t. But I think the war is over,” he told the reporters in The Hague earlier that day.
Trump framed the recent joint U.S.-Israeli offensive against Iran as a decisive blow to Tehran’s nuclear ambitions and dismissed a U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) report that the attacks may have only delayed Iran’s nuclear program by a matter of months as “inconclusive.”
“The intelligence was very inconclusive. The intelligence says we don’t know. It could’ve been very severe. That’s what the intelligence suggests,” Trump said. “It was very severe. It was obliteration. Iran’s nuclear program has been put back decades.”
Trump further asserted that Tehran is unlikely to attempt rebuilding its nuclear facilities, suggesting instead that Iran would pursue a diplomatic route.
“I’ll tell you, the last thing they want to do is enrich anything right now. They want to recover,” he said. When asked whether the U.S. would launch another strike if Iran resumed its nuclear enrichment efforts, Trump responded plainly, “Sure.”
Meanwhile, in a separate post on his Truth Social platform, Trump warned Israel not to break the ceasefire with further military action against Iran, emphasizing that the U.S. mission had “reasserted the credibility of American deterrence.” He then declared that, “Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. I’ve said that for 15 years.”
Visit Nuclear.news for similar stories.
Watch Trump and Netanyahu’s news conference as they talk about “bringing peace to the Middle East.”
This video is from the NewsClips channel on Brighteon.com.
Israel planning military strike on Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Israel and Iran trade deadly strikes as nuclear talks collapse.
Iran accuses US of violating nuclear treaty with airstrikes.
Israel weighs strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, with or without U.S. backing.
Sources include:
Tagged Under:
chaos, damage, dangerous, global security, international law, iran nuclear program, Israel-Iran conflict, Middle East war, military escalation, military tech, military technology, national security, nuclear, nuclear facilities, nuclear weapons, Trump administration, US airstrikes, violence, weapons technology, WWIII
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2018 MILITARYTECHNOLOGY.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. MilitaryTechnology.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. MilitaryTechnology.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.