U.S. considers unprecedented nuclear deal with Iran amid ongoing tensions

• The White House is considering a deal to ease sanctions on Iran in exchange for a halt to uranium enrichment, offering up to $30 billion for a civilian nuclear program, as part of efforts to bring Iran back to negotiations.
• The U.S. insists on Iran ceasing all uranium enrichment, a condition Iran has historically rejected, citing national sovereignty, which complicates the negotiations.
• Recent military strikes in Iran and Israel have led to a ceasefire, with the Trump administration claiming success in degrading Iran’s nuclear capabilities, despite skepticism from some intelligence reports.
• Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine have defended the military operation, citing precision strikes and intelligence assessments, while the Pentagon prepares for an “irrefutable” press conference to address conflicting reports.
• The potential deal could significantly impact regional security, the global non-proliferation regime, and U.S. relations with Middle Eastern allies, highlighting the complexity of resolving the Iranian nuclear issue.

The White House is reportedly considering a deal that would ease sanctions and provide Iran with up to $30 billion to develop a civilian nuclear program, contingent on Tehran halting all uranium enrichment. This proposal is part of an intensifying effort to bring Iran back to the negotiating table.

The discussions involve key players from the U.S., Iran and Middle Eastern countries, with the Trump administration leading the negotiations. Arab partners are being pressured to fund the proposed nuclear program.

It all began after a ceasefire was struck following a flurry of military strikes in Iran and Israel over the past two weeks. The discussions have continued this week, with the White House and the U.S. Department of Defense playing central roles.

Central to the discussions is the condition that Iran must cease all uranium enrichment. This is a non-negotiable red line for the U.S., but one that Iran has consistently refused to accept, citing national sovereignty. The Iranian government’s insistence on maintaining its enrichment capabilities poses a significant challenge to the negotiations.

Military operations and assessments

During the Pentagon press conference on Thursday, June 26, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the Trump administration’s actions, emphasizing the success of the military strikes.

“President Trump has created the conditions to end the war, decimating Iran’s nuclear capabilities,” Hegseth asserted. He criticized media reports that suggested the strikes only set back Iran’s program by months, framing the skepticism as anti-Trump bias.

Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, provided a detailed account of the military operation, highlighting the precision of the strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

“The weapons functioned as designed, meaning they exploded,” Caine stated. He cited intelligence assessments and eyewitness accounts to support the claim that the strikes were successful in hitting their targets.

Caine emphasized that the Joint Force does not conduct battle damage assessments, leaving that task to the intelligence community. However, he noted that the Pentagon has been preparing for such an operation for years, suggesting a long-standing plan to target Iran’s nuclear facilities.

The Pentagon’s press conference

In response to leaked Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reports suggesting the strikes did not destroy Iran’s nuclear capability, the Pentagon is set to hold an “irrefutable” press conference. The aim is to provide more details on the B-2 bomber raids and to address the controversy surrounding the DIA report. (Related: Intelligence report: U.S. strikes FAIL to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program.)

President Donald Trump has defended the pilots who carried out the strikes, claiming they were upset by “fake news” reports that questioned the success of the operation.

“These Patriots were very upset,” Trump wrote on Truth Social, expressing his support for the military personnel involved.

The CIA has since backed Trump’s claims, with CIA Director John Ratcliffe stating that the agency has obtained “credible evidence” indicating Iran’s nuclear program has been severely damaged. However, the language used by Ratcliffe leaves room for interpretation, adding to the ongoing debate.

The potential deal with Iran, if realized, could have far-reaching implications for regional security and the global non-proliferation regime. It could also influence the future of the Abraham Accords and the dynamics between the U.S. and its Middle Eastern allies.

As the world watches closely, the outcome of these negotiations will be crucial in shaping the future of U.S.-Iran relations and the broader geopolitical landscape. The Trump administration’s willingness to engage in talks, despite recent military actions, underscores the complexity of the situation and the challenges of finding a peaceful resolution to the Iranian nuclear issue.

Watch the video below that talks about the majority of Republicans backing Trump in strikes on Iran.

This video is from the TrendingNews channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Trump: Nuclear deal with Iran UNNECESSARY as Tehran’s facilities already destroyed.

Trump REJECTS Putin’s offer to mediate Israel-Iran conflict, tells Russian leader to focus on Ukraine.

Trump Admin cracks down on intelligence leaks after classified Iran report surfaces.

Sources include:

ZeroHedge.com

Edition.CNN.com 1

Edition.CNN.com 2

Brighteon.com